Where did it come from?
Where indeed did transgender come from? A lot of people like to talk about transgender and whether it’s a good thing or a bad thing, but they seldom speak about where it all began.
An article by Bartholomew written back in November 21, 2016 goes into great detail as to where transgender may have come from.
Taking excerpts from an uncensored magazine, issue 49: September to December 2017, you will get a greater understanding as to where gender identity comes from.
The modern progressive will promote the idea that we have to tolerate everyone. This is increasingly harmful to people with mental illness. One group in specific, in many cases, are the transgendered. Anyone that promotes a different solution to the issues is labelled a bigot, a transphobe without listening to their arguments or objective medical information.
The concept of gender identity is: what you think you are socially is more important than what you are from a standpoint which balances social and personal views. One problem stems from this idea is the belief that there are no meaningful differences between the terms “sex” and “gender”. The idea started with a sexologist in 1955 named John money. He proposed that if a boy were raised as a girl they would fundamentally be female, and that there are no intrinsic differences between the sexes contrary to biology.
“Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: ‘XY’ and ‘XX’ are genetic markers of male and female, respectively – not genetic markers of disorder. The norm for human design is to be conceived either male or female. Human sexuality is binary by design with the obvious purpose being the reproduction and flourishing of our species. This principle is self-evident. The exceedingly rare disorders of sex development (DSDs) including but not limited to testicular feminisation and congenital adrenal hyperplasia, are all medically identifiable deviations from the sexual binary norm, and are rightly recognised as disorders of human design. Individuals with DSDs do not constitute a third sex.” – The American College of paediatricians
He could not shill his ideas to anyone until he found a boy by the name of David Reimer. Shortly after birth, Reimer had lost his genitalia following an accident during his foreskin removal surgery. (Shaun’s notes: another reason not to have your foreskin removed) he decided to swoop in and perform some “progressive” human social experimentation on this helpless child who had just been mutilated. He had Reimer’s testicles also removed, and constructed an artificial vagina for him.
This is how sick and twisted society has become. We hear about Dr Mengele during the Second World War and what atrocities he may have committed, but where do we hear of the atrocities to come out of these sick people such as this so-called sexologist named John money? Nowhere to be seen. You will damn sure see the mainstream media talking about the atrocities of World War II and the oh so evil Nazis, but have you ever heard of the name John money? You haven’t. Selective programming you see? And you have to ask yourself why.
Money would later talk about his experiment as successful, despite David never having identified as a woman, and would later recall the visits with Money as traumatic.
“Rates of suicide are 20 times greater among adults who use cross sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBTQ – AF – firming countries. What compassionate and reasonable person would condemn young children to this fate knowing that after puberty as many as 88% of girls and 98% of boys will eventually accept reality and achieve a state of mental and physical health?”
This link does not seem to be active any longer. But if you need proof that the article did actually exist, you can write me at this e-mail address: dessnr@Hotmail.com and I will send you a photo of the magazine I’m reading this from, itself.
One of the things that shits me the most is the child abuse movement. The child abuse movement will come at you for smacking a child, overfeeding a child, scolding a child in public etc, but yet we have all these stupid parents that condone having sex with another man’s anus. Or for that matter having sex with a woman’s anus, which in itself is degeneracy. They also condone their kids at 10, 11, 12 years of age and even younger in some cases to want to change sex, not even fathoming for a moment what this is going to do to the child’s mind as they grow older. They just simply say “no that’s fine little Johnny”, or “that’s fine little Suzie, go right ahead and be the opposite sex.” And all the while the child has no idea what sex really is as yet. It doesn’t matter if they are six, seven, eight, nine or ten, their minds have not yet developed enough to understand truly what sex is both physically and mentally. And I’m not just talking about the act of sex, I’m talking about sex in gender.
So here we have, a whole heap of people out there that like to write to me once in a blue moon, and say things like “you’re a horrible person Shaun, because you speak of racist things. You are an anti-semite.” Yet they can freely say that it’s okay to have sex with a man’s anus or a woman’s anus, and they think I’m the crazy one?!
Let’s take a look at the definition of anti-semitism for a moment. From the Wikipedia (which is totally inaccurate on the definition of anti-Semitism) it says:
“anti-Semitism is hostility to, prejudice, or discrimination against Jews. A person who holds such positions is called an anti-Semite.”
Nothing could be further from the truth. Semitic peoples are those of the Arab lands as a whole. Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon among other places in the Middle East. Anybody that spoke the Semitic languages.
From the contradictory Wikipedia a conflicting article entitled Semitic people:
First used in the 1770s by members of the Göttingen School of History, the terminology was derived from Shem, one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis, together with the parallel terms Hamites and Japhetites. The terminology is now largely obsolete outside linguistics. However, in archaeology, the term is sometimes used informally as “a kind of shorthand” for ancient Semitic-speaking peoples.
So how can we trust anything from the Wikipedia given that it contradicts itself around so many corners? How can we trust what it has to say about transgender people, given that it does not even consider the highest suicide rate that comes from within?
So many people these days like to quote the Wikipedia but they have no idea that the Wikipedia in itself is written by you and I, and lets face it you and I are not scholars on the subject. I’m not saying that we are not intelligent enough to become scholars, by all means not at all, but what I am saying is that we are not scholars at the present time. Or it least in most of us are not.
It should be duly noted that John money was also a paedophile himself. From the Wikipedia:
John Money was critical in debates on chronophilias, especially pedophilia. He stated that both sexual researchers and the public do not make distinctions between affectional pedophilia and sadistic pedophilia. Money asserted that affectional pedophilia was about love and not sex.
If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who’s intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual … then I would not call it pathological in any way.
Money held the view that affectional pedophilia is caused by a surplus of parental love that became erotic, and is not a behavioral disorder. Rather, he took the position that heterosexuality is another example of a societal and therefore superficial, ideological concept.
It should also be noted that young Reimer later committed suicide. Again, from the Wikipedia:
John William Money (8 July 1921 – 7 July 2006) was a psychologist, sexologist and author, specializing in research into sexual identity and biology of gender. He was one of the first scientists to study the psychology of sexual fluidity and how the societal constructs of “gender” affect an individual. Recent academic studies have criticized Money’s work in many respects, particularly in regards to his involvement with the sex-reassignment of David Reimer and his eventual suicide. Money’s writing has been translated into many languages, and includes around 2,000 articles, books, chapters and reviews. He received around 65 honors, awards, and degrees in his lifetime.
So all of you transgender people that are doing what you are doing just because it’s made out to be the new cool, you might want to think about where all of this gender identity stuff began. To all of you that are apparently, allegedly, authentic transgender (Shaun’s notes: if you can use authentic and transgender in the same sentence whilst keeping a straight face) you too might want to look into the origins of gender identity and perhaps get a hold of some cognitive thinking therapy, to change the way you think so that you are not a part of this oh so degenerate behaviour and movement.
To all of the youth out there, especially the millennial’s, I know it brings you attention when you identify as the opposite sex to what you are, but this will not bring you anything besides bad pleasures as time goes on and as you age. Take a look at the suicide statistics and ask yourself why this is, when it comes to homosexuality and the transgender movement. Try to think ahead instead of thinking just for the moment. Look at the grand chessboard in front of you and consider your every move, knowing full well that if you miss a move or a trap somewhere along the line, your king is going to be in threat. YOU are your own king. Do not end up in checkmate. Don’t bend for a friend!
From Healthline.com we see some of the problems that come with anal sex that usually trails transgender human beings. A lot of people think that anal sex just comes down to homosexuality, but this is quite simply not the case. Quite often with transgender males especially that are transitioning into becoming female indulge in anal sex, at least until they end up with female genitalia.
The tissue and skin around the anus acts as a protective barrier for the bottom half of your digestive tract. However, the tissue inside the anus is thinner, delicate, and more likely to tear and bleed as a result of penetration. This increases the likelihood of passing infections, viruses, or bacteria between partners. Even two partners who don’t have any sexually transmitted infections (STIs) can still pass bacteria between each other through these tears in the skin.
This is just one of the many complications you can have with anal sex. All the while we must keep in mind that the above website also says that you will not have any trouble as time goes on with being able to hold on to your poop. This is a blatantly false statement and the reason I say this is because I’ve spoken to multiple nurses on this very subject and they themselves have had to fit colostomy bags to many homosexuals and many other people that indulge in anal sex as heterosexuals. And I for one do not think they are lying or inaccurate, given that they have been nurses almost all of their lives.
Never forget that a lot of these websites that you read on the web these days are written by quacks. These are not doctors, nor are they nurses and those that are doctors and/or nurses on the Web need to be researched in every way shape and form so we know how long they have been doctors and how long they have been nurses. Many of these younger doctors that range between age 25 to 35 are wet behind the ear big Pharma lackeys that have been trained to further an agenda through propaganda even when they often don’t know that this is what they are doing.
So how do we feel now that we all know that the study of gender identity was founded by a paedophile? How many of you parents will now go out and explain to your children that changing their gender identity is born out of a paedophile’s mind? Given that paedophilia is now being made out to be normal, (Shaun’s notes: I did a show about this just recently as to how the powers that be are saying that paedophilia is a sexual orientation rather than a perversion) by people in high places.
I’m daring to say that many of you adults out there will not change your mind because you’ve been bought up through the perversion and degeneracy that comes out of your television’s, magazine’s, the Internet etc… To be curious however, I wonder just how many of you will actually go out there and change your way of thinking? It takes a strong mind and will that cannot be broken to do such a thing. As the saying goes from a doctor him or herself, “it’s very easy to kill somebody; try saving somebody instead, that’s a challenge”. How hard will it be for you to change the way you think? How hard a challenge will it be to change your own paradigm?
You take care of yourselves. And your anus!