2019-09-24 Edition of White Wellness w/ Tabitha

On this edition of White Wellness, Tabitha speaks about:

  • The equinox
  • Showing gratitude to the earth
  • Eating seasonally is better for the body
  • Making infused honey that you can use in Winter
  • Some recipes on how to use sage and it’s benefits
  • Health gurus that keeled over from poor health
  • Efficient low fat diets
  • Tabitha answers some chatroom questions
  • Lack of certain nutrients and gut flora can affect mental health
  • Different oils and margarine’s to steer clear of
  • Keeping away from Aspartame among other sweeteners
  • Cholesterol is important to the brain and body
  • Caution when it comes to what cookware you have
  • Zinc is important, especially for your libido – (That ant bit my tongue)
  • Soaking you legumes is an important part of preparation
  • When using olive oil for salads try getting raw olive oil

And much more!

DOWNLOAD

Tabitha Joins WTFR

That’s right Ladies and Gents.  If you didn’t get to hear the latest broadcast then you’re missing out on the reasons as to why Tabitha has moved on over here.  In a nutshell, Tabitha was fired by Rengrenade on ridiculous notions.  The same ol’ “schtick” when it comes to Degenerade Broadcasting.

Tabitha will be speaking about a great many things and one of those things will be vitally important for many of you.  Do you know what that is?  I’ll tell you what that is.  Your health and wellness.  There is nothing better than being healthy but more so having the knowledge to learn how to remain healthy under almost any circumstances.

You will be able to hear White Wellness with Tabitha each Tuesday evening at 8 PM EST in the States which means us Aussies will be able to listen in each 10 AM on every Wednesday, AEST.  Bare in mind that time will change during DST, on the account of both Australia and America.

So don’t miss out.  The start date of the show will be on the 24th of September.  For Australians that will be the 25th.  Yep, that means tomorrow!

As the old saying goes, “Be there or BE SQUARE!”

 

2019-07-26 Edition of TCTA w/ Shaun Surplus

On this edition of TCTA, Shaun speaks about a lot of things.  The show will speak for itself.  Including where he comments on Alison Chabloz’ latest message to the public about her plight.  Not to mention the positive outcome when it comes to what has been taking place with his Daughter.

DOWNLOAD

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HLoe8QgaMvPt/

Alison Chabloz link above…

TCTA w/ Shaun Surplus 2019-03-22

On this 4 hr edition of Two’s Company, Three’s Allowed, Shaun speaks about:

  • Shaun speaks with Fredrick C. Blackburn in the first 2 hours….
  • GUN CONTROL – Bruce Willis, Ice T, Sandy Hook victim, Venteran, speak up
  • Kurt Russel on Guns Control – I’ve played this a lot, but it still makes sense
  • STEVEN SEAGAL On Gun Rights! Guns Don’t Kill People, People Kill People

And much more…

DOWNLOAD

TCTA w/ Shaun Surplus 2019-03-08

On this 4hr edition of TCTA, Shaun speaks about:

  • Bikers-In-Town
  • Ben Daglish – Wikipedia
  • Indians-Taking-Over
  • YouTube-Clip-About-People-About-To-Die
  • Filthy Kike Zuckerberg putting phone numbers out
  • Anger over Facebook’s use of personal phone numbers Download This Show
  • Husband hacks ‘rapist’ to death in South Africa after catching him ‘attacking his pregnant wife’ _ Daily Snail Online
  • Milo-Government-Backs-Down
  • Rose McGowan on #MeToo and how women caused a ‘cultural reset’ The World
  • Primary school AXES anti-homophobia lessons after protests from Muslim parents _ Daily Mail Online
  • House Democrats plan vote to condemn anti-Semitism after Muslim Rep. Ilhan Omar’s latest ‘slur’ _ Daily Snail Online
  • Worst ever immigration minister_ Asylum seekers jet in under Dutton’s nose
  • Why Australia keeps changing prime ministers Politics Explained
  • WA Parliament turns away from Indigenous youth suicide, despite coroner’s urgent plea – ABC News (Australian Bullshit Corporation)
  • Police fury after thug, 18, avoids jail despite being caught carrying a ‘fearsome’ knife _ Daily Snail Online
  • ‘One gun in the hands of every eighth person’_ Number of registered guns in NSW reaches milestone
  • Shaun- whoolisblog.chatango.com & “white boys”
  • The lowdown on the US government shutdown What’s Going On
  • Some music to finish off your day…

And much more as usual…

DOWNLOAD

 

The Right and the Wrong For Children

Hello ladies and gentlemen.

I was recently sent an e-mail about something I said on the latest broadcast when it comes to the custody of children. What I was discussing, was when the mother has predominant care for the children, she cannot be the prime decision maker. As the father of the children, I too have a part in the decision-making.

The e-mail goes on to discuss that when either the mother or the father are the predominant parent, that parent maintains the right to make 100% of the decisions for the child or children. I am here to tell you ladies and gentlemen that this is simply not true.

The only time one or the other parent has predominant decision-making for the child or children is if there are court orders put in place. If there is a court order put in place by a judge in family Court, then and only then can the law enforce predominant decision-making by one of the two parents. That of course would be the parent that maintains full custody of the children. But even then, the judge can deem the other parent that does not have full custody, fit to make decisions for the child or children.

So let’s reiterate. Unless the parents go to court to have court orders put in place for the children, and that court order states that one or the other parent does not have decision-making rights, then both parents have equal rights to the decision-making for the said children.

You also have to look at the verbal contracts. You and I may not necessarily call them verbal contracts, we may call them verbal agreements. Meaning, if I and my ex-girlfriend breakup after having children, then we come to a verbal agreement on how we are going to bring these children up as a separated couple. For example, my ex and I verbally agreed that she would have the children predominately, but both of us would have equal rights to the decision making for them. Bear in mind that we do not use terms such as verbal contracts in our daily speech per se, the court does. It recognises our verbal agreements as verbal contracts.

The court takes everything into consideration in both laymen’s terms and law speech. What I mean by law speech, is the speech used in court, by both lawyers and the judge. So when we state in front of the judge that we made a verbal agreement, the judge will see that as a verbal contract. Now when he or she, make their final judgement it will not necessarily depend on that verbal contract, but then again it may. Especially if the parents have never been to court for the children before.

When I was discussing on the recent broadcast, that it was in fact against the law for my son to be vaccinated without my consent, I meant it in the literal sense of the verbal contract between the mother and myself. The mother and myself have never been to court for our children. We felt, that it wouldn’t just be bad for us, but that it would be bad especially for the children and this is the most important thing that so many people fail to realise or simply forget.

Given that there is no contract put in place by the family court, there is nothing saying that I do not maintain the right to make decisions for the children. In fact due to the verbal contract between the mother and myself, there is everything that says I have absolute equal right to take part in the decision making for our children.

So you see, you have to get to know the way the court system works. There are many court systems, but in this case it is family Court that I had to get to know.

Now I understand, that there will be many men that e-mail me after reading this article. They will be questioning me as to why I didn’t go for predominant custody, when the mother and I were making the verbal contract. It’s very simple. Her and I get along quite well. Well enough anyway, that it was made easy for me to make what I think was the right decision.

As a father I wanted what was best for the children, and I believe that in the early stages of bringing up children, they need the maternal instinct rather than that the paternal instinct. And to this day I think I made the right decision. I get to see my kids whenever I want to, as I said on the broadcast. The mother of my children and I get along well enough, that if I was to say to her, “I want to have the kids tomorrow because I’ve got something important for them to see or do”, she would be the first one to bring them to my house or to allow me to go and pick them up.

The decision made for the vaccination was illegal. Albeit that her and I get along quite well, there are certain things that are done that go against our verbal agreement. I am dead against vaccination and needed to be contacted when this was going to take place, (the school where the vaccine was administered, is in fact just as much complicit) so that I could be a part of that decision. I was not. In the eyes of the court the verbal contract was broken. Unless of course the mother was to lie about the verbal contract in the first place, at which point the court would become the decision maker about whether or not both parents will have equal rights to make the decisions for the said children from the time of judgment and an order put in place.

Also, whilst our government is pushing to have mandatory/compulsory vaccines for children in every way it can, many judges around our country still maintain that it should be a parent’s choice. (Although this is changing) The court’s main concern is whether the parents can cognitively and cogently decision-make between each other, in the best interest of the children. If they cannot, then it will go to Council as to who is more suited to the decision-making of the children.

In the meantime however, the decision-making between the mother and myself needed to be exactly that. Especially as far as I’m concerned, was such an important decision when it comes to the health of our children.

If you have any further questions or queries, you can contact me at dessnr@hotmail.com and I will do my best to answer your questions and/or queries.

SS.

Q – A Video Not To Be Ignored

Last week on Robert Reyvolts show he played a clip called ‘Q’.  He and I are in a bit of a back and forth about it as we speak and I wanted to post the clip here so that people can have a look for themselves.  This is not a clip that should be ignored.  Take heed.