TCTA w/ Shaun Surplus 2017-01-31

On this edition of TCTA Shaun speaks about:

  • Trumps ban on muzzos signed by Obongo
  • Equality for White Western Worlds
  • Lying is ridiculous and unneeded
  • Death threats are coming in

And more!


Music breaks played on:  January 31, 2017

——– ——
22:14:30 bump ShaunChoices01-Bumps-30-01.mp3
22:17:00 bump Commodore 64 Remixes – 002 – Jizzman – Draconus.wav
22:29:30 bump Commodore 64 Remixes – 007 – Chronblom – Block’n Bubble (Carbonated version).wav
22:32:10 bump Commodore 64 Remixes – 133 – Press Play on Tape – Fairlight.wav
22:44:30 bump Commodore 64 Remixes – 048 – Andreas Wallstrom and NecroPolo – DMC demo IV 2 (Celtic Mission mix).wav
22:47:10 bump Jean_Snippet.wav

8 thoughts on “TCTA w/ Shaun Surplus 2017-01-31

  1. Here is the problem im having with CG and his bible bashing and most christians dont seem to notice that the alleged Jesus calls out the jews in serious condemnation. I use this to my advantage. I can go to any jew lawyer, representative and say “look Jesus calls jews “satanic, liars and murderers” in which we can infer THERE IS NO DOING BUSINESS WITH SATANIC JEWS. Yet almost every god damn christian goes along with the satanic jew, until I show them John 8:44-48. Ive practically converted the dour Jehovah Witnesses on the spot. You know how people chase them away ? I dont let them leave until I show them Jesus’s jew rant. To me ? The whole bible is about how the jews are gonna fuck you. Yet this seems to escape Charlies and others logic. I could careless who wrote the god dam KJV bible BUT whoever wrote that ONE verse did the whole world a favor and its absolutely true. I like Charlie but he is more pissed off at the church leadership than the book itself. He could have countered every rebuttal with bible verse. Of course there is problems with the book “Woe unto the scribes” and I dont really have personal attachment to the book but as someone who studies the god damn jews, John 8:44-48 is GOLD. Its the Ace in the Hole and almost everyone misses this perfect quote. “Jesus said it, I didnt . . .” You see? The burden is on Jesus and not you.
    Charlie is a good researcher but he gets caught up in irrelevant minutae . Like 911 phone calls from planes that never existed, or people who didnt fly on the fake planes. He still can’t be bold and say “no fucking planes” and its fucking obvious no planes were used. Ive been to the senators three times to explain this. Im pretty sure Trump KNOWS no planes were used. He just wont say anything BUT 88 generals got behind him because they know too. Jesus Christ We are wasting time God dammit !


    • Nobody has to agree with everything Charles says or the way he does things. I happen to really enjoy his show against stupidity. The bible in my opinion is a golden book fairytale and if Charles wants to take that to pieces, it’s fine with me.

      I hope to have Charles here some day and when I started WTFR, I said to myself that I want the utmost of opposite extremes on the network. So on one hand, we would have Charles taking the bible to pieces and the other hand we would have a Christian using the bible as a weapon. The reason being is because I want a network that will suit every listener, not just a network that pleases me.

      If I don’t want to listen to either one of them, I just don’t tune in to listen. It’s not rocket science.

      And Max, with all due respect, the only time I see wasted, is when a person tunes in to listen to something they don’t enjoy or learn from. I don’t tune in to renegade for that reason. I give their broadcasts not a single ounce of my time.



  2. My point is the Christian bible is the ONLY religious book with such a condemnation against the jews. Whether its true or not, it can be used against the jew. Most Christians dont even know its in there. I love Charlie, We email back and forth a bit. Im just getting tired of arguing and correcting everybody, everyday over this bullshit. You cant say it was the Jews until you establish the crime scene. That one bible verse John 8:44~48 works against my mortal enemies . I tell people I am an Odinist anyways. My war strategy is to turn ALL races against the jew. Its the only way we have a chance. Renegade wont even explore the idea BUT I had to hear the red hair witch go on and on about FE, like a fucking religious zealot. Of course she believes the earth is flat. She is a blithering idiot and she attacked me and that was a big mistake. I can prove that no planes were used. Ill bet most muslims are dupes and believe planes were used. We dont want alienate Islam, we also dont want to be looking over our shoulder and fighting on two fronts “The enemy of my enemy is my ally”. Nobody seems to be able to get their mind wrapped around the “no planes” . Eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable. I dont care what people think they saw or heard, you still must have physical evidence at the end of the day. Bill Cooper set the bar high for research, that even he couldnt follow. He wasnt right on WWII. And I would tell him so. Bill was taken out because he would have told the world the video footage is laughably fake fake fake. Another reason I talk about the “no planes” is I am a veterans advocate and many vets flew off to the middle east over cartoon planes. I would think we would want the vets on our side instead of Israel’s side. Aye ? Anyways keep up the good work. My two shekels.


    • “Correcting everybody”? So you’re the in all end all on this subject that needs to “correct everybody” because you believe for a moment that your precious verse in the bible answers everything against the jews?

      PLEASE Maxx. Give me a fuckin break man. I respect your bible, not much more than I respect the Babylonian Talmud.

      The next time you want to talk down to somebody, make sure it wasn’t somebody that was bought up by priests and nuns within Catholicism alright mate?

      If a host joins the network that happens to be Christian, then by all means, join hands with him/her but I am not that host in the meantime OK?

      As for the red haired FE’er twit, I don’t see how she has any bearing in the show I did here.

      Cheers mate, but no thanks.


  3. There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.

    The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

    Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty-five years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

    Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a mobile phone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

    The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

    Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

    Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

    Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

    Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

    If there is no victim, there is no crime.

    We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

    Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?

    Where does it end?

    Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

    Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of liberty?

    Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?

    If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

    If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

    If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

    If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

    Who wants to live in a prison?

    Think. Question everything.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.