I’ve been speaking about the docility of these fat cats and bureaucrats for years and the flaws in their research, thanks to Rocket Scientists like Dr. David Evans and Joanne Nova of Science Speak, educating me so well, when it comes to the global warming issue. This article really makes a lot of sense and only adds to the growing amount of information that goes directly against Al Gores junk science.
From Sanfrancisco CBS Local:
BERKELEY (KCBS) — Environmental scientists at UC Berkeley are saying that there are too many trees in the California’s forests.
The researchers say fewer trees would leave more rain water available to meet the state’s demand.
Professor Scott Stephens, of the UC Berkeley Department of Environmental Science Policy, said that when it comes to snow and rainfall, trees have first dibs.
“Less tree cover also means less water usage,” he said.
Stephens said research shows that after a century of firefighters suppressing forest fires, rather than letting them burn, water that flows into streams has diminished.
“It’s just hugely important that we have change that trajectory in big scales; we’re talking about hundreds of thousands of acres—not 5,000. We’re talking big areas,” Stephens said.
“If we don’t do this, we’re really going to look back at this period right now in 30 years and say, ‘this is a huge missed-opportunity.”
He said in Yosemite National Forrest, for example, there were 40 fires allowed to burn out over decades and that his study shows that, as a result, there was more water supplies in streams in rivers.
In addition, Stephens said, that with more trees in the Sierra, the more snow that collects on them and evaporates, rather than feeding surface water.
Other scientists, however, argue that the more trees there are, the better because they help remove carbon dioxide from the air, which they say contributes to global climate change.
Below: Shaun speaks with Dr. David Evans about global warming.